What is good about Prothon?

[Mark Hahn]

"Mike C. Fletcher" <mcfletch at rogers.com> wrote...

>             I'd want clarification of how to store a reference to
>             another object's (bound) method (which is *extremely* common
>             in Python code for storing, e.g. callbacks)
>     * I really dislike the :( ): function definition notation,
>       "Readability Counts".  Why clutter the proposal with that?
>     * I'm neutral on the with: stuff, I'd much prefer a real block
>       mechanism similar to Ruby with (if we're using implicit targets),
>       the ability to specify the .x target for the block

For what it's worth, you are basicly in agreement with the current proposals
for Prothon.