Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.com
Mon Apr 26 14:47:37 EDT 2004
In article <gxcjc.321$Yc.3829 at news4.e.nsc.no>,
Leif B. Kristensen <junkmail at solumslekt.org> wrote:
>Cameron Laird rose and spake:
.
.
.
>> I continue to conclude that all these languages are
>> roughtly equally competent at managing strings.
>
>Perhaps, but right now I think that I'm in love with Python. Consider
>these two equivalent routines in PHP and Python:
.
[marvelous, if
slightly unfair,
example]
.
.
>My PHP coding may be suboptimal, but in terms both of codability and
>readability as well as in sheer elegance, I find the Python version
>superior in any way.
.
.
.
I consider infatuation with Python entirely healthy. In
fact, I often *do* argue just the same position as you
take here: that Python is strongly and demonstrably superior
to PHP. I just want to be as precise as I can about what the
differences are.
--
Cameron Laird <claird at phaseit.net>
Business: http://www.Phaseit.net
More information about the Python-list
mailing list