Pure Python XML parser
Uche Ogbuji
uche at ogbuji.net
Wed Oct 8 09:46:07 EDT 2003
jjl at pobox.com (John J. Lee) wrote in message news:<873ce5q707.fsf at pobox.com>...
> Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> writes:
>
> > "Ellinghaus, Lance" wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a pure python XML parser?
> >
> > http://www.fourthought.com (I *think* it's pure XML...)
>
> I guess you're referring to 4DOM. Fourthought no longer maintain
> that. It's part of PyXML now.
>
> I was about to say that 4DOM isn't up-to-date with the DOM spec, but
> now I come to think of it, I'm not certain whether the XML part is or
> is not up-to-date. What I am sure about is that the HTML DOM part
> isn't (it's level 2, but based on the prosposed spec. of September
> 2000).
>
> Whatever, 4DOM certainly isn't as standards-compliant as pxdom.
I haven't used 4DOM for years. There are certainly better
alternatives.
But I think this discussion is off topic. The OP was asking about
*parsers*, not DOM implementations. For all we know, he's not even
interested in DOM at all. After all, DOM pretty much sucks.
The only pure Python parser I know of is xmlproc, which is part of
PyXML.
http://pyxml.sourceforge.net/
--Uche
http://uche.ogbuji.net
More information about the Python-list
mailing list