PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)

[John Burton]

"Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> wrote in message
news:5d83790c.0310231158.65595858 at posting.google.com...
> Peter Norvig's creative thinking triggered renewed interest in PEP 289.
> That led to a number of contributors helping to re-work the pep details
> into a form that has been well received on the python-dev list:
>
>     http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0289.html
>


This seems a well thought out and useful enhancement to me.
Personally I like the syntax as proposed and would vote yes if this was the
kind of thing we got votes on!