Why don't people like lisp?
Pascal Costanza
costanza at web.de
Wed Oct 22 09:48:01 EDT 2003
Ville Vainio wrote:
> Lisp might have a good future ahead of it if it was only competing
> againt C++, Java and others. Unfortunately for Lisp, other dynamic
> languages exist at the moment, and they yield greater
> productivity.
This is true for the things that are currently en vogue.
> Most bosses are more impressed with getting stuff done
> fast than getting it done slowly, using gimmicks that would have given
> you an A+ if it was a CS research project.
I have implemented an AOP extension for Lisp that took about a weekend
to implement. The implementation is one page of Lisp code and is rather
efficient (wrt usability and performance) because of macros.
I have heard rumors that the development of an AOP extension for Python
would take considerably longer.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza University of Bonn
mailto:costanza at web.de Institute of Computer Science III
http://www.pascalcostanza.de Römerstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn (Germany)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list