Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
Rainer Joswig
joswig at lispmachine.de
Wed Oct 8 15:54:52 EDT 2003
In article <6CZgb.3273$dn6.860 at newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"Andrew Dalke" <adalke at mindspring.com> wrote:
snip
> And here's Table 31-2
>
> Statements per
> Language Level Function Point
> -------- ----- --------------
> Assembler 1 320
> Ada 83 4.5 70
> AWK 15 25
> C 2.5 125
> C++ 6.5 50
> Cobol (ANSI 85) 3.5 90
> dBase IV 9 35
> spreadsheets ~50 6
> Focus 8 40
> Fortran 77 3 110
> GW Basic 3.25 100
> Lisp 5 65
> Macro assembler 1.5 215
> Modula 2 4 80
> Oracle 8 40
> Paradox 9 35
> Pascal 3.5 90
> Perl 15 25
> Quick Basic 3 5.5 60
> SAS, SPSS, etc. 10 30
> Smalltalk (80 & V) 15 20
> Sybase 8 40
> Visual Basic 3 10 30
>
> Source: Adapted from data in 'Programming Languages
> Table' (Jones 1995a)
I thought these numbers were bogus. Weren't many
of them just guesses with actually zero data
or methodology behind them???
snip
More information about the Python-list
mailing list