PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)

[sdd]

John Burton wrote:
> ...{about PEP 289)...
> 
> This seems a well thought out and useful enhancement to me.
> Personally I like the syntax as proposed and would vote yes
> if this was the kind of thing we got votes on!

Ahhh, you do get a vote, but more by reason than numbers.
The PSF is watching this discussion with bated breath.
This whole discussion in c.l.p is part of examining the
merits of the PEP.

Don't tell anyone that I mentioned the inner workings of
the PSF cabal, or ..................................~}~~}