[OT] Parables and barbarians

[Nick Vargish]

Timo Virkkala <a at a.invalid> writes:

> Go is imperfect. Go with Hex (or Nash, as it was originally known,
> after it's inventor John Nash).

Can you explain what you mean by imperfect? I assume that's some
mathematical condition?

>From a lay-person's view, Hex is less than perfect, since according to
Nash's proof, the first player can always win.

Nick

-- 
#  sigmask  ||  0.2  ||  20030107  ||  public domain  ||  feed this to a python
print reduce(lambda x,y:x+chr(ord(y)-1),' Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAcboefstobudi/psh?')