Getting happier ;-), but wondering if I'm thinking pythonically

Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue May 20 20:05:30 EDT 2003


"Graham Nicholls" <graham at rockcons.co.uk> wrote in message
news:CYvya.128$Eg1.3 at news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...

> Firstly, is this in general, the right way?  This is my second
attempt - the
> first program worked but didn't use classes, or optik, and was more
limited
> in scope.  BTW is using external modules like optik a bad idea if
you want
> programs to be portable (doesn't matter for this program, but might)

Portability across systems or across time?  For the latter, I would
judge partly on the license.  If the version you have does what you
want and you have the right to distribute it with you code forever,
little problem.  If the owners of the code can pull the rug out from
under you, so to speak, bigger problem.

> Anyway, thanks for looking - I hope I'm OK in posting this here?

Something this big would normally be posted as a link if one has the
web space to do so.  However, since so many of us have suggested you
give Python some more time, I think it fair to post the result of
doing so.


Terry J. Reedy






More information about the Python-list mailing list