Gui Advice Needed: wxPython or PyQT ?

Jim Richardson warlock at eskimo.com
Fri May 9 04:43:01 EDT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 8 May 2003 22:51:14 +0100,
 Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 May 2003 9:17 pm, Jim Richardson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2003 16:45:28 +0100,
>>
>>  Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 08 May 2003 4:37 pm, Gerhard Häring wrote:
>> >> Phil Thompson wrote:
>> >> > My experience with the commercial version of PyQt doesn't agree with
>> >> > this. While some organisations have licenses for dozens of developers,
>> >> > most are single user licenses.
>> >>
>> >> It's quite common to only buy one single-user license for the entire
>> >> team in my experience.
>> >
>> > Then I'd like to know of anybody breaking the terms of the license
>> > like that so that I can set the lawyers on them.
>> >
>> > Phil
>>
>> If only one developer is using it at a time, how does that break the
>> license terms?
> 
> It doesn't - but you used the word "if". The statement I was
> responding to doesn't say "one at a time" and (to me at least) didn't
> even imply it.
> 

Maybe so, but it doesn't exclude it either. It was not entirely clear to
me (hence the if). I agree, that if two people are using the same single
user licence, at the same time, then one of them is in violation of said
licence. If they are not, then I don't think they are in violation.
Unless the licence has some clause stating that. 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+u2oVd90bcYOAWPYRAk0AAKC5Px98k4pHpNgALe+DJoU1k7SMEACgkPKh
Ja/30HS9wipY6VTk63u8ckQ=
=7nO9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Jim Richardson         http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock

Linux, because eventually, you grow up enough to be trusted with a fork()




More information about the Python-list mailing list