Voting for PEP 308 (was Re: For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression)

[Stephen Horne]

On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 12:46:20 -0500, "John Roth"
<johnroth at ameritech.net> wrote:

>
>"Stephen Horne" <intentionally at blank.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:fk146v0grlbdk2n0nghuh4mqv2lhq296qa at 4ax.com...
>> On 9 Feb 2003 15:05:48 -0500, aahz at pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>>
>> >At a minimum, after the voting procedure is agreed on.
>>
>> And that can't happen until we've voted on what the voting procedure
>> should be ;-)
>
>So what? Since Guido is going to make up his own mind,
>and it's already known that he's not going to be bound by
>the vote however it comes out, argueing over the fairness
>of the voting procedure is moot.
>
>This is simply an advisory poll.

Read what I said again (particularly taking note of the smiley) and
you might notice that it was a joke.

Did you really think I was suggesting we should vote on what voting
procedure to use? And perhaps first vote on what voting procedure to
use for the voting procedure vote? And perhaps, before even that, we
should vote on what voting procedure to use for the voting procedure
voting procedure vote? And perhaps, before that...  ;-)

If my joke said anything about the vote, it was suggesting we don't
need to make quite so much fuss over it - which seems to be your point
too.

-- 
steve at ninereeds dot fsnet dot co dot uk