Vote on PEP 308 (how to reject)

[Jeremy Fincher]

Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote in message news:<mailman.1046632144.5492.python-list at python.org>...
> Gerrit Holl <gerrit at nl.linux.org> wrote previously:
> |Although it's true that if one rejects all, it's strange to have
> |to do this.
> 
> Perhaps Raymond will specify otherwise, but it seems to me that if you
> wish to vote to reject the introduction of any ternary operator, you
> could fill out the following:
> 
>     Q reject   NONE
>     Q reject   NONE
>     Q reject   NONE
> ...
> That seems to meet all the rules.  Of course, I guess this leaves the
> danger that a new ternary expression spelled "NONE" (for every C, x, y)
> will be added to Python :-).

The *real* danger, though, is that a ternary operator will end up
being added and your voice (as far as your preference for which
ternary operator add if one must be added) will be unheard.

Jeremy