PEP 318 - Function Modifier Syntax
Roman Suzi
rnd at onego.ru
Mon Jun 9 23:53:04 EDT 2003
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Ulrich Petri wrote:
>"Roman Suzi" <rnd at onego.ru> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>news:mailman.1055178919.28798.python-list at python.org...
>> On 9 Jun 2003, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>
>> >This is the first draft of a PEP describing new syntax for applying
>> >function modifiers (e.g. classmethod, staticmethod, etc). There is
>> >currently no implementation of the proposed syntax (I have heard rumors
>> >that the 'def foo(self) [...]' syntax has a patch somewhere, but I
>> >haven't seen it yet). I have already received a few comments and will
>> >revise the document soon. The latest version will always be available
>> >at http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0318.html.
>> >
>> >
>> > def classmethod foo(self):
>> > perform method operation
>>
>> oh no... I hope Python will not be another Java. I think current
>>
>
>The proposed syntax was (though its not easy to comprehend from the PEP)
>
>def foo(spam) as classmethod:
> .....
This doesnt change my attitude to it. And if [,]-syntax is intuitevely
understandable (to those who likes TeX/LaTeX), this syntax is misleading
because "as" must mean "aka", as it is the case in Python's import operator or
SQL's semantics.
>Ciao Ulrich
>
>
>
Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
--
rnd at onego.ru =\= My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3
More information about the Python-list
mailing list