Revised PEP 318 - Function/Method Decorator Syntax
Andrew Bennetts
andrew-pythonlist at puzzling.org
Tue Jun 10 21:39:18 EDT 2003
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:28:45PM -0000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Andrew Bennetts <andrew-pythonlist at puzzling.org> wrote:
>
> > class EvilProperty(type):
> > def __new__(cls, name, bases, d):
> > return property(d.get('get'), d.get('set'), d.get('del'), d['__doc__'])
[Oops, I meant "d.get('__doc__')", not "d['__doc__']"...]
> >
> > class C(object):
> > class x:
> > """An evil test property"""
> > __metaclass__ = EvilProperty
> > def get(self):
> > print 'Getting'
> > return 1
> > def set(self, value):
> > print 'Setting to', value
>
> Wouldn't it be more readable (:)) if you did
>
> class _EvilProperty(type):
> ....
> class EvilProperty:
> __metaclass__ = _EvilProperty
>
> class C(object):
> class x(EvilProperty):
> def get(self):
[...etc...]
No, it wouldn't be more readable, because it wouldn't work...
-Andrew.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list