path module
Just van Rossum
just at xs4all.nl
Tue Jul 8 11:02:29 EDT 2003
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Just> Also: this would not be portable on platforms not using / as
> Just> os.sep, ...
>
> Not necessarily.
True, but it takes guessing: "did the author really mean to specify
several path components here, or is he/she intentionally using the unix
path separater in file names on a platform that _does't_ use / as the
path separator?". In the face of ambiguity etc.
> My guess (again, without trying it) is that it does
> the right thing.
It doesn't...
> Nonetheless, before anything like Jason's path module is incorporated
> into the standard distribution, a PEP is almost certainly required.
> I imagine there are some things which could be done better (or at
> least differently) to make the overall module more acceptable.
Absolutely. I really like Holger's observation that having path objects
levels the road to virtual file systems (eg. use a zip file as a file
system). Anyone intersted in volunteering to write that PEP? I'd like to
contribute in some way, but I'm not going to write more than 1 PEP per
year :-).
Just
More information about the Python-list
mailing list