anything new on the ternary operator?
Bob Gailer
bgailer at alum.rpi.edu
Sun Jul 6 19:19:19 EDT 2003
At 10:59 PM 7/6/2003 +0200, Tor wrote:
>What's the current status on the ternary operator that may or may not be
>added to python. Haven't heard much about that since the vote was announced
>for a couple of months ago. What's the best way to follow that dicussion?
>Or are we just waiting for the developers to make their decision?
Last I heard it was killed by Guido, which makes me wonder why we spent so
much time discussing and voting. If he did not want it I wish he had killed
it at the start. I thought the vote was to determine the best choice, and I
was looking forward to having it.
<grumble>Makes me wonder about the whole PEP process. Why bother! </grumble>
Bob Gailer
bgailer at alum.rpi.edu
303 442 2625
-------------- next part --------------
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.492 / Virus Database: 291 - Release Date: 6/24/2003
More information about the Python-list
mailing list