anything new on the ternary operator?

[Peter Hansen]

Erik Max Francis wrote:
> 
> Mind you, such discussion will not be very constructive, but just
> saying, "Welp, it's not going to be added, nobody talk about it ever
> again" is not going to be very effective when new people come in all the
> time and, one must admit, at least some segment of the user community
> would have liked the feature.

At least by then the FAQ will be updated to point to the updated PEP,
which will, as originally intended, clearly explain the background,
the discussion, the vote, and the "final" decision.

-Peter