Best Python editor (under Linux)
Steve Lamb
grey at despair.dmiyu.org
Fri Jan 3 01:39:55 EST 2003
On 02 Jan 2003 22:08:36 -0600, Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> wrote:
> No, it's clearly the former. You're just confused about what a program
> is.
No, I am not confused about what a program is. However, I do not consider
overzealous scripts written for an editor to be programs in their own right.
> The python-mode for emacs is a python editor. Insisting that it isn't
> a valid answer to the request for a python editor because it requires
> an emacs runtime environment makes no more sense than discounting IDLE
> because it requires a Python runtime envirnoment.
Oddly enough I don't consider IDLE an editor either. Point stands, Emacs
is the very antithesis of the proper way to do things. It is a monolithic,
bloated, musch-cram-every-feature-into-it piece of software. 26Mb for a
"editor" is not what I consider reasonable or keeping in the tradition of
small specialized programs that do one task well.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
To email: Don't despair! | -- Lenny Nero, Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-list
mailing list