Bug with super() and reload()?

[Just]

In article <7kd5nmgp.fsf at python.net>,
 Thomas Heller <theller at python.net> wrote:

> martin at v.loewis.de writes:
> 
> > Thomas Heller <theller at python.net> writes:
> > 
> > > Should this be considered a bug, or is it simply a wart, and reload
> > > should be avoided?
> > 
> > I think reloading a module should create a new module dictionary, even
> > though such a change may break existing usage of reload.
> 
> I cannot imagine what this would change with the case I described?

The old class would still refer to the old namespace (through the 
func_globals attr of the function objects), thus finding the correct 
(but old ;-) base class.

Just