Stackless Python, Tail Recursion and Functional Programming
Christian Tismer
tismer at tismer.com
Mon Jan 13 23:05:09 EST 2003
Tim Peters wrote:
...
> Except when I'm paid not to -- but nobody is paying me enough for that these
> days. Ouch -- truth *does* hurt <wink>!
I'd love to be able to pay you, but you are invaluable.
> I heartily approve of your plans to change the truth about nothing faster
> than CPython being possible. I wouldn't start that by worrying about tail
> recursion, though.
Never really worried about tail recursion. It's a general
question about Python, same category as macros.
Python is not a subject to get changed. It is, instead,
the only fixed point we have, and we'll do everything to keep it.
> if-god-didn't-like-loops-he-wouldn't-have-given-guido-absolute-
> power-ly y'rs - tim
Möge die Macht mit ihm sein -- a Jedi
More information about the Python-list
mailing list