why not extending the syntax for classes, too ?
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Mon Feb 10 07:27:30 EST 2003
Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> writes:
> Anton Muhin wrote:
>
> > Just my 0.002$ --- why not 'of': class C(B) of <metaclass> or
> > def foo(x) of staticmethod (etc.)?
>
> Well, that's a new keyword ...
This would be easy enough to do as a 'pretend' keyword like as is at
the moment. Still don't like the idea, mind.
Cheers,
M.
--
The potential of having part of my car's drive-train functioning
as a pr0n server is both intellectually fascinating and
metaphysically disturbing. -- Steed, asr
More information about the Python-list
mailing list