PEP-308 a "simplicity-first" alternative

[Bjorn Pettersen]

> From: Bengt Richter [mailto:bokr at oz.net] 
[...]
> I think I have an answer:
> 
>     result = cond and {true_value} or false_value

Yes, we got you the first three times <wink>. Your proposal

 1. Doesn't give any indication that the expression is
    a selection (i.e. the same as x and y or b).
 2. Introduces random symbols that give simple expressions
    new (and surprising) meaning... (i.e. just like Perl.)

-- bjorn