For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression

[Jack Diederich]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:45:28PM -0800, Dave Brueck wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Jack Diederich wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:46:55PM +0100, holger krekel wrote:
> > > What about a missing else clause? e.g.
> > >
> > >         <expression> if <condition>
> >
> > if (<condition>): <expression>
> >
> > is already legal so I'm -1 for yet another way to do it
> 
> Argh! :)
> 
> Please don't vote on this unless you've followed the discussion.  This is
> not what the PEP is about.

It was a reply to your reply about the PEP, but I'll rephrase it.

I'm against extending the PEP to include <expr1> if <cond> instead of
just <expr1> if <cond> else <expr2> as the PEP states.

-jackdied