One last PEP308 suggestion

[Marco Mariani]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:49:09AM -0600, Evan Simpson wrote:

> Here's my last thought for a PEP308 syntax that meets my criteria:
> 
> (? <cond>: <true>, <false> ?)
> 
> The '(?' and '?)' are single tokens.  If you're not allergic to the idea 
> of an n-way conditional, it allows for:
> 
> (? <cond1>: <expr1>, <cond2>: <expr2>, <default> ?)
> 
> Its grammar is obviously feasible, it can't be confused with "if", it 

Yeah!!!! it won't be confused with Python!!!!