c.l.py.{help,future,library,language,misc,advocacy,gui,platform-dependent,moderated,ternary,peps,whining,flamewar,timbot,obfuscated,goto}

Roman Suzi rnd at onego.ru
Sun Feb 9 10:39:30 EST 2003


On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Gerrit Holl wrote:

>Roman Suzi schreef op zondag  9 februari om 16:02:49 +0000:
>> >To summarize: add one more group, for discussion of PEPs and issues
>> >around the futurs of Python. Focus c.l.py on existing implementations
>> >and their use.
>> 
>> Or yes, and c.l.py.advocacy for those who want to go flamewar.
>
>I'm not sure whether this is meant ironically or not, but if so, I
>don't understand why. I think Roman Suzi is right. We could start
>with a pep-sig.

The problem with PEP-SIG is, that different people are interested
in different PEPs... 


Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
rnd at onego.ru =\= My AI powered by Linux RedHat 7.3






More information about the Python-list mailing list