(partial) summary of ideas for the ternary operator

[Michael Hudson]

mis6 at pitt.edu (Michele Simionato) writes:

> Having read the thread on the ternary operator, I would like to comment
> some of the ideas that have been proposed and asking for new ones ;-)

Please please please can people stop spawning new threads for this
topic?

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  My hat is lined with tinfoil for protection in the unlikely event
  that the droid gets his PowerPoint presentation working.
                               -- Alan W. Frame, alt.sysadmin.recovery