ternary operator vote

[Bengt Richter]

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:46:38 GMT, Andrew Koenig <ark at research.att.com> wrote:
[...]
>
>I would like to suggest that whenever there is a vote on PEP308, it be
>conducted as an approval vote: List all of the alternatives, allow
>people to vote for as many alternatives as they like, and count the
>votes.
+1 if you allow the votes to be from {-1, -0, +0, +1} with abstention as 0.

IOW, I think there ought to be a direct way of expressing disapproval as
well as approval. With the above, there is no reason not to vote on each,
except to express utter indifference.

Regards,
Bengt Richter