Another conditional expression candidate (PEP 308)

[Anders J. Munch]

"Erik Max Francis" <max at alcyone.com> wrote:
> "Anders J. Munch" wrote:
> 
> > The BDFL shot down the straight, parentheses not required version, in
> > the pep.  Looks too much like a statement.  Perhaps requiring
> > the parentheses that I would have used anyway will mend that.
> 
> Does it?  The example shows the syntax with parentheses, but doesn't
> really make a specific point about that.  

He did in the first version of the PEP.  

He's-allowed-to-change-his-mind-of-course-ly y'rs, Anders