About the use of **args

[Jacek Generowicz]

Duncan Booth <duncan at NOSPAMrcp.co.uk> writes:

> Mark McEahern <marklists at mceahern.com> wrote in 
> news:mailman.27.1071059861.9307.python-list at python.org:
> 
> > # We can still access the "private" member variable.  In Python,
> > # private is merely a convention.
> > print s._size
> 
> Except that in Python the convention for private variables is to begin them 
> with two underscore characters, and then it is more than just a convention:

Now, I always believed that "private" in Python is spelt "_", while
"mangle this name for me because I want to avoid name clashes in
multiple inheritance scenarios" is spelt "__".

However, I've heard _so_ many people make the (in my opinion
incorrect) claim that "private" is spelt "__", that I'm beginning to
question my sanity.

Where is the Python spelling of "private" set in stone ?

I find the suggestion that a mangled name is somehow "more private"
than one with a single leading underscore, mildly insulting to the
clients of your code. The implcation is that they can neither work out
the (very complicated and cryptic[*]) mangling scheme, not use dir().

If a Python programmer wants to acces a private attribute, he can do
so, regardless of the number of leading underscores.


[*] Sarcasm alert. (This alert was brought to you by the International
Campaign for Promotion of Understanding between Cultures.)