UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice

[John Roth]

"Steve Lamb" <grey at despair.dmiyu.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbu7m1s.u03.grey at dmiyu.org...
> On 2003-12-20, John Roth <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what your point is.
>
>     If you had run it you would have understood it.  You didn't run it,
did
> you?

It doesn't matter. As you can see by my reply to Bengt,
the crux of the issue is that, in Ruby, the function call
syntax is *optional.* There is no way to make it optional
in Python, and it is not clear whether it should be.

What I'm missing, however, is any *thoughtful*
discussion of the issues involved. Your [perjoritive
adverb deleted] response makes it clear that you
didn't think of the issues, you just reacted.

John Roth

>
> -- 
>          Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
your
>        PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of
souls.

No, you're not, and you will never be.

John Roth