Py2.3: Feedback on Sets

[Raymond Hettinger]

> > * Are the docs clear?  Can you suggest improvements?

[Carl Banks]
> Yeah: in the library reference, the table entry for s.union(t) should
> say "synonym of s|t" instead of repeating the description.  This is
> especially true because it's not clear from a simple glance whether
> "s.union(t)" goes with "s|t" or "s&t", because it sits right between
> the two.  Better yet, I would change it to a three-column table
> (operation, synonym, result).

Done!


Raymond Hettinger