Pythonic way to sum n-th list element?
Steven Taschuk
staschuk at telusplanet.net
Sun Apr 20 02:31:02 EDT 2003
Quoth Alex Martelli:
[...]
> So, I tried implementing sum in the simplest way, as a
> separate patch to operator.c (leaving add alone) -- THAT
> gives me 124 microseconds, a 50% speedup with respect to
> the simple for loop and clearly sufficient to justify
> sum's existence (together with its simplicity, clarity,
> and likely frequency of use). [...]
+1. Optimization of the most common case. Excellent.
I'm not sure such a sum function belongs in the operator module,
though. At the moment I think it might fit best as a built-in; it
goes nicely with min and max.
--
Steven Taschuk Aral: "Confusion to the enemy, boy."
staschuk at telusplanet.net Mark: "Turn-about is fair play, sir."
-- _Mirror Dance_, Lois McMaster Bujold
More information about the Python-list
mailing list