Using __repr__ or __str__ for own printable class?
Christian Tanzer
tanzer at swing.co.at
Mon Apr 14 04:02:57 EDT 2003
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote:
> IMHO the most maddening use of __repr__ is that done by the
> implementation of __str__ for all built-in container types:
>
> >>> class X:
> ... def __str__(self): return 'str'
> ... def __repr__(self): return 'rep'
> ...
> >>> print [X()]
> [rep]
> >>>
>
> There's supposed to be a good reason for this to print [rep],
> rather than [str] as common sense would suggest, but I keep
> forgetting it (so it's probably nor very compelling;-).
You aren't seriously suggest the behavior
>>> print ["abc", "d[e]"]
[abc, d[e]]
, are you?
--
Christian Tanzer tanzer at swing.co.at
Glasauergasse 32 Tel: +43 1 876 62 36
A-1130 Vienna, Austria Fax: +43 1 877 66 92
More information about the Python-list
mailing list