Why is Python popular, while Lisp and Scheme aren't?

Jacek Generowicz jacek.generowicz at cern.ch
Sun Nov 10 07:18:10 EST 2002


David Eppstein <eppstein at ics.uci.edu> writes:

> Lisp is based around singly linked lists while Python uses 
> vectors (with efficient random access unlike Lisp lists)

Sigh. More FUD.

Please look at 

http://www.lispworks.com/reference/HyperSpec/Body/15_.htm

It is the chapter of the Hypertext version of the Common Lisp ANSI
standard, which describes that which you imply does not exist.

(On second thoughts, don't look at it, because once you have, you may
well become disappointed with what Python has to offer in terms of
arrays.)

> and dictionaries.

http://www.lispworks.com/reference/HyperSpec/Body/18_.htm

(There are also alists and plists which can serve a similar purpose,
and may well be more appropriate is some situations.)

> They are also not especially similar in programming style,

You'll find plenty of people who disagree.



More information about the Python-list mailing list