Has Red Hat helped or hurt?
Cliff Wells
logiplexsoftware at earthlink.net
Mon May 13 12:27:37 EDT 2002
On Sun, 12 May 2002 16:49:06 -0600
Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:12:35AM +0200, Christian Tanzer wrote:
> >IMHO, the distribution should not force a specific Python version to
> >be the default. I.e., having /usr/bin/python point to 2.x should not
> >break any number of Red Hat utilities. Forcing the user to specify a
> >Python version in the #! line or on the command line sucks.
>
> Yeah, in a perfect world people would write code that anticipated any
> problems that future releases of the language might cause... When you
> figure out how to do this, go ahead an submit a patch to Red Hat...
I think the better solution has been mentioned here several times: if Red Hat
is going to build utilities that require a certain version of Python (which is
not unreasonable) then they should have a special installation called
"python-rh" or something and use that rather than require users to name their
version "python2" or whatever.
Hopefully they will take this approach when 8.0 comes out.
--
Cliff Wells, Software Engineer
Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net)
(503) 978-6726 x308 (800) 735-0555 x308
More information about the Python-list
mailing list