Paul Rubin wrote:
...
>> forever). If you get unanimous agreement from all the usual c.l.py
>> suspects that they won't piss and moan if I fix it, I will.
>
> I'm in favor of fixing it.
I'm not, particularly, but I won't complain if it's changed -- my code
using random makes no hypothesis about whether r.seed keeps or resets
r.gauss_next, anyway.
Alex