Thoughts on new grammar rules (PEP 284 in particular)

[Terry Reedy]

"Steve Horne" <steve at lurking.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:82undu4anb47usgck50ebil2ku1f36173q at 4ax.com...

> I was wondering if maybe it is time that the Python 'core' grammar
was
> considered broadly complete,

I've been thinking much the same thing.

>with the exception of a special notation
> specifically designed for the purpose of wrapping new grammar rules.

but to me, complete means "don't make many more changes" rather than
to facilitate making
lots and lots ;<)

Terry J. Reedy