Status of PEP's?

[David Eppstein]

In article <a61afo$5si$1 at peabody.colorado.edu>,
 Fernando Perez <fperez528 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> And by the way, as far as counting goes one could argue that 1..5 is 
> even more natural, as it truly spans the set of the natural numbers of which 
> 5 is a member, as opposed to the less 'standard' set of the 'non-negative 
> integers less than 5'. But that's a minor nit-pick.

While we're picking minor nits, I would consider the natural numbers to 
include zero.