PEP 276 (was Re: Status of PEP's?)

[David Eppstein]

In article <a5psh2$ga8$1 at bob.news.rcn.net>,
 "Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> wrote:

> There is a pair of ideas that are intuitive, clean, and routinely useful:
>    for i in indici(seqn)
>    for i, item in indexed(seqn)

Isn't this in PEP 212?
Maybe it should be undeferred?
-- 
David Eppstein       UC Irvine Dept. of Information & Computer Science
eppstein at ics.uci.edu http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/