syntax question: "<>" and "!=" operators
Mike Dean
klaatu at evertek.net
Sun Mar 17 15:58:54 EST 2002
* David Mertz, Ph.D. <mertz at gnosis.cx> [2002-17-03 15:08]:
> Nonetheless, I think of the natural language semantics of the
> symbols--or maybe better "insinuations"--prefers '<>' to '!='. The
> (good) one suggests "is greater than or less than (but not equal to)".
> I know that not everything is technically in an order relation, but it
> still "makes sense" at a first approximation. The (bad) one looks like
> some odd sort of augmented assignment. "Hmmm... assign, what? The
> negation of the right side to the left side?! The LHS negated with the
> RHS?!"
One thing that's always baffled me on this issue (along these lines) -
why does Python have != as a not-equal operator, when ! is not the not
operator?
-Michael
--
The generation of random numbers is too import to be left to chance
-- OpenBSD Fortune database
More information about the Python-list
mailing list