Pep 276 - if 6 were 9

[James_Althoff at i2.com]

An interesting observation.

Plus I really like the Hendrix reference <wink>.

Jim

=====================================


<Emile>
If, in the beginning, Guido opted to call 'in' 'of', would there be a
question of iterating over an integer?

For example,

for each of range(6):
for each of mylist:
for each of 6:

I'm not advocating a change here, but just wondering how thinking in
terms of 'in' vs 'of' might influence the debate.  Or am I too far on
the supporting side to appreciate that this has no bearing on it
what-so-ever-thank-you-very-much?  ;-)

<aside>
This came to me as I showered -- does that make it a sodden thought?
;-)
</aside>

--

Emile van Sebille

</Emile>