Black Adder and piquet
Ron Stephens
RStephens at viteonline.com
Fri Mar 1 13:20:05 EST 2002
Thank you. If you do find the documentation you worked on, I would be glad
to have it and maybe I can add to it. Thanks
Ron Stephens
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Pierce [SMTP:wayne at mishre.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:06 PM
> To: Ron Stephens
> Cc: python-list at python.org
> Subject: Re: Black Adder and PyQt
>
>
> Ron Stephens wrote:
> > I am thinking of buying a "home" license of Black Adder, to use for
> > making GUI's for Python programs to be used on Linux+KDE and also
> > perhaps for the new Sharp Zaurus. Does anyone have any experience with
> > Black Adder that they can share? One of my main reasons for wanting
> > Black Adder is to use the GUI builder, so I am particualrly interested
> > in opinions about that aspect of Black Adder, but I am also interested
> > in other aspects as well.
>
> I really like the GUI builder of BA, unfortunately I think it could use
> more work. Granted it is __still__ in beta, but it's been in beta for
> quite a while without an update. When I do GUI development I typically
> do the first part in BA, then manually add in the GUI pieces that BA
> doesn't support directly yet (like menus).
>
> The only thing I don't like about the GUI builder is that it doesn't
> support a lot of widgets yet. The last I heard they were waiting for Qt3.
>
> > One question I have concerns licensing. If I buy the "home" version,
> > could I still share my programs as GPL'ed open source, or would that
> > require me to buy the "professional" license, which is much more
> > expensive? In other words, my programs would never be used in any
> > commercial way but I might want to post them as open source, free
> > software.
>
> As I understand it, the only restriction on redistribution is if you are
> distributing commercial apps. Then you need the business edition to
> redistribute Qt and the other modules. It might be good to get the
> scoop directly from them on this since I got the business edition and
> haven't had to worry about it.
>
> > I know Black Adder is still in beta, but is it stable enoough to use
> > already? I suppose I should ask how it compares to PythonWare amd
> > WingIDE, but I kind of favor the PyQt toolkit becuase it will
> > hopefully work well on the Sharp Zaurus as well as the KDE desktopI
> haven't had too many problems with BA's stability; typically I use BA
> for the GUI design and syntax highlighting then compile and test in a
> shell. I've had some lockups when using the run from within BA in the
> past, not all the time but I was never able to figure out what would
> cause it so I just skipped it all together.
>
> The documentation could use some work, most of the PyQT docs are in C++
> and can take some fiddeling to get right. At one point I started to do
> some documentation for BA to give to some coworkers, if I can find it
> you are welcome to it (they decided to stick with Perl, so I never had
> to finish it).
>
> They have a mailing list (somewhere) for BA discussions, I forgot what
> the address is and had it sent to an address I no longer have access to.
> :( If you do purchase BA, I would say skip the support and the option
> to receive CDs. In the time that I have had the program there hasn't
> been an update, the support is so-so and they haven't ever sent a CD.
>
> Even with all of that BA is usually the second program I open when I do
> Python development (the shell is first). The feature I like most is the
> ability to collapse code blocks.
>
> Wayne
> --
> Wayne Pierce
> web: http://www.mishre.com
> email: wayne at mishre.com
>
> "What you need to know."
More information about the Python-list
mailing list