PEP 285: Adding a bool type
David Eppstein
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Sat Mar 30 02:42:34 EST 2002
In article <3CA56915.62947DDC at alcyone.com>,
Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> wrote:
> > I offer the following PEP for review by the community. If it receives
> > a favorable response, it will be implemented in Python 2.3.
>
> Outstanding! I've been waiting and hoping for Booleans in Python since
> I first was introduced to it.
It's not an important issue to me, but I like the PEP.
> > 3) Should the constants be called 'True' and 'False'
> > (corresponding to None) or 'true' and 'false' (as in C++, Java
> > and C99).
>
> I'm also a C, C++, and Java guy, but I think that True and False (rather
> than true and false) are more Python, as you say, given None. Internal
> consistency makes more sense to me than matching other languages.
What he said.
--
David Eppstein UC Irvine Dept. of Information & Computer Science
eppstein at ics.uci.edu http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list