symbolic python

[Peter Hansen]

Ira Baxter wrote:
> 
> > > no support for Python is (yet) mentioned in the list of supported
> > > languages.
> 
> That's because our tools are designed to accept langauge definitions
> easily.   A Python grammar would take only a few days to develop.
> 
> If you want to transform Python symbolically, DMS will do the
> job very well, and I don't see many alternatives out there.

"Will"?  When?  Or did you mean "could"?

-Peter