sockets - recv with time out
David Bolen
db3l at fitlinxx.com
Fri Jan 11 18:21:54 EST 2002
"Steve Holden" <sholden at holdenweb.com> writes:
> Erm, how would you do a recv() when your program is blocked waiting for
> select() to return? Non-blocking sockets are an absolute necessity for this
> application, and timeoutsocket is the best solution, as Oleg has already
> said.
Others have answered the specific question, but I just also wanted to
point out that all timeoutsocket itself is doing is exactly what I
suggested - in lieu of a straight recv() it selects() and then
receives. Although it does temporarily enable non-blocking for calls
like connect() and accept() and exports the ability for the user of
the class to set non-blocking as with standard sockets, its default is
blocking, and it works fine there too.
--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
\ David Bolen \ E-mail: db3l at fitlinxx.com /
| FitLinxx, Inc. \ Phone: (203) 708-5192 |
/ 860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT 06902 \ Fax: (203) 316-5150 \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list