Sourceforge or Savannah or ...

[Erno Kuusela]

In article <slrna596m6.8e4.philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk>,
philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk (phil hunt) writes:

| On 27 Jan 2002 20:04:20 +0200, Erno Kuusela <erno-news at erno.iki.fi> wrote:

|| one difference i've noticed is that sourceforge has a terrible
|| mailing list archive system (geocrawler or somesuch) whereas savannah
|| uses pipermail.

| Do you have any experience with pipermail?

it works, and is very simple, and it is comfortable to use.
look in eg. <URL: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/gcl-devel/>.

doesn't handle mime very well unless it's been fixed recently
(attachments & quoted-unreadable encoding).

mhonarc has more features. www.mail-archive.com offers free
mailing list archiving using mhonarc, but it sometimes lags
a few days.

  -- erno