Autocoding >Re: "Introduction to Ethics",

Timothy Rue threeseas at earthlink.net
Sun Jan 27 22:48:40 EST 2002


On 27-Jan-02 17:05:23 Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> wrote:
>Christopher Browne wrote:
>>
>> Kragen Sitaker <kragen at pobox.com> writes:
>> > Craig Brozefsky <craig at red-bean.com> writes:
>> >> I've read almost all of them, and I understand what you see VIC as.
>> >> Might I suggest that you perhaps set your sights for an example
>> >> code on a project which is completable in a year or so of work in
>> >> your spare time, and when complete may not ever be part of the
>> >> finished VIC, but will embody the model of user interaction you are
>> >> talking about.
>>
>> > Can you explain what he sees VIC as, please?  I really want to know,
>> > but I can't figure it out.
>>
>> It sort of looks like the denizens of comp.sys.amiga.misc drove him
>> from there, and he as a result headed to comp.lang.python and
>> gnu.misc.discuss to spread his "vision."

>I dug up pieces of the sordid history with the Amiga newsgroup, but
>I didn't find evidence that they actually drove him out.  Do you have
>any details on how that process worked, or are you just guessing?

>That information may become more relevant after a while....

>-Peter


Why the negative connotation Peter?

Amiga has a project under alot of NDAs. I do not sign NDAs, because I
don't need to, to know what is going on.

Perhaps you have a problem that I do not support closed system proprietary
stuff that I know I've been an influence in.

As such, GNU directions have always been there and I've always been one in
support of FSF directions.

The Amiga has had the three primary interfaces from the beginning and
there is a great deal in the way of applications, devices, libraries, even
system functions that have had arexx port support. However, there is
plenty regarding the fall of the Amiga that has finally out weighed the
positive. But that is the old Amiga and the startup that has bought the
trademark and has rights to the technology is not improving uponthe old
technology but rather doing something different.

In essence, there really is little future left in the old amiga and the
new stuff is clearly so closed system oriented in one way of another that
It is not appealing.

The python newgroup is because after alot of research, it shows the most
promise in various areas, such as cross platform compatable, it's GPL
compatable and it's open source.

It really should just be common since for anyone to figure this out,
especially for those who have really read any ofthe writing I've done on
the VIC. Even woithout understanding what the VIC is, I've made my intent
clear about it being an open and free project, as in GPL.




---
*3 S.E.A.S - Virtual Interaction Configuration (VIC) - VISION OF VISIONS!*
   *~ ~ ~      Advancing How we Perceive and Use the Tool of Computers!*
Timothy Rue      What's *DONE* in all we do?  *AI PK OI IP OP SF IQ ID KE*
Email @ mailto:timrue at mindspring.com      >INPUT->(Processing)->OUTPUT>v
Web @ http://www.mindspring.com/~timrue/  ^<--------<----9----<--------<




More information about the Python-list mailing list