What does Python fix?
Joseph A Knapka
jknapka at earthlink.net
Thu Jan 17 16:43:20 EST 2002
François Pinard wrote:
>
> [Mark McEahern]
>
> > As for Lisp's parentheses, I've never used Lisp, but when I look at
> > examples, I have to control my overwhelming desire to vomit when I see that
> > profusion of parentheses.
>
> Of course, whoever reads LISP code (and I still like LISP, even if I prefer
> Python) looks at the indentation to understand it, not the parentheses.
Yes. Lisp is conceptually beautiful, much more so than any
other languages I've used (though Forth and Prolog come close:-),
but the parens are just unbearable. McCarthy, it seems,
actually wanted Lisp to have syntax; I wonder what that
would have looked like?
Someone should write a Lisp system that uses indentation
a la Python instead of parens. That would rock. Especially
if it compiled to Python bytecode and could use the
entire Python library. Hmm.... I guess the result might
be called "Python."
Cheers,
-- Joe
"I should like to close this book by sticking out any part of my neck
which is not yet exposed, and making a few predictions about how the
problem of quantum gravity will in the end be solved."
--- Physicist Lee Smolin, "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity"
More information about the Python-list
mailing list