Python is just as good as C++ for real apps

[Jason Orendorff]

Courageous wrote:
> Well I've always been talking about p, because "*p" isn't an atomic
> thing, it's the identifier "p" with the operator "*". I could with
> a lot of work show you an abstract syntax tree that proves it, too. :)

I think someone didn't read the original message before replying,
actually.  Not to name names.  (C:

Grant wrote:
> Think of it as meaning that *p is of type int
> rathing than p is of type int*,
> and then it makes a bit more sense.

## Jason Orendorff    http://www.jorendorff.com/