Paul Hughett <hughett at mercur.uphs.upenn.edu> writes:
> It could be worse. In one language I worked in, "10" was an octal
> integer, "10." was a decimal integer, and "10.0" was floating point.
> Nice language otherwise, though.
Maclisp?
Cheers,
M.
--
"The future" has arrived but they forgot to update the docs.
-- R. David Murray, 9 May 2000